Relevance Ranking — LT World

LT World


provided by

dfki logo

with support by

eu star logofp7 logo


meta logo
clarin logo

as well as by

bmbf logo


take logo


This site uses Google Analytics to record statistics about site visits - seeĀ Legal Information.

You are here: Home kb Information & Knowledge Technologies Relevance Ranking

Relevance Ranking

Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment.
Jon M. Kleinberg.
Journal of the ACM. 46 (5). 1999. 604--632.

The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual Web search engine.
Sergey Brin and Lawrence Page.
Computer Networks and ISDN Systems. 30 (1--7). 1998. 107--117.

Mining the Web.
Soumen Chakrabarti.
Morgan Kaufmann Publishers. San Francico. 2003.

Link Analysis in Web Information Retrieval.
Monika R. Henzinger.
IEEE Data Engineering Bulletin. 23 (3) 2000. 3-8.

Term-weighting approaches in automatic text retrieval.
Gerard Salton and Christopher Buckley.
Information Processing and Management. 24 (5). 1988. 513-523.

Queries given to search engines or other retrieval systems are often not very specific, and lead to a large number of matching documents. In these cases the retrieval system should have a good estimate of the relevance of the documents to the user's needs, so that "good" documents show up early in the enumeration. A large number of factors should enter into a good ranking method, including the positions of the query terms in the document, linguistic context of the matches, link popularity, classification of the documents, user models etc. "Classical" methods compute a mesaure of "distance" between the query and the retrieved document, such as TF/IDF or cosine similarity. For hyperlinked documents, methods which make use of the hyperlink structure have proved very effective for relevance ranking. Google was the first large-scale search engine to make use of hyperlink sructure for relevance ranking.


Relevance; Topical Relevance; Aboutness